{"id":"W2154988461","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0003","title":"The Institutional Theory of Legal Interpretation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Interpretation (philosophy); Scope (computer science); Status quo; Law and economics; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Law; Legal realism; Legal research; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007941378,0.0008210544,0.001012064,0.003613518,0.006778172,0.01563244,0.003203015,0.005838466,0.007564852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112387,0.0006498728,0.001488693,0.003704578,0.07458308,0.01399,0.005310288,0.007401556,0.001331526],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02076034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01764123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03889381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0219878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873255,0.00597067,0.0004843783,0.001479373,0.00308035,0.001659715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943494,0.003153875,0.0004807325,0.0009265389,0.0008370302,0.000252473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[8.92971e-7,8.241637e-7,0.00001567096,0.000007172627,0.000001412738,0.000007397743,0.0002163503,0.0001022034,0.000006891943,0.9985698,0.0004295843,0.0006417049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004940936,0.000002785725,0.00005845198,0.00004124067,0.000003370744,0.00001914545,0.000208039,0.0003240543,0.00003876131,0.9723644,0.02692993,0.000004955069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005827955,0.01004938,0.122516,0.03722361,0.0005594735,0.00008846051,0.0001874292,0.0001962002,0.8233515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8947473,0.008375593,0.03648809,0.008314798,0.001584451,0.0003318215,0.0002375219,0.0002300445,0.04969035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03889381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1506275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0148778977809773,"score_gpt":0.2264908908722523,"score_spread":0.211612993091275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}