{"id":"W2155115835","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00202.x","title":"An economic evaluation of the environmental benefits from pesticide reduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Pesticide; Contingent valuation; Valuation (finance); Agriculture; Damages; Cost–benefit analysis; Willingness to pay; Economics; Natural resource economics; Pesticide residue; Business; Agricultural economics; Geography; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003542692,0.0005309033,0.0006139559,0.002005602,0.0004776756,0.002156738,0.0006143548,0.0009211233,0.005210354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01278973,0.0003015044,0.0007259308,0.001671562,0.001331733,0.001427426,0.0008380472,0.001000128,0.0001635558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00662841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002029509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01670207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01308026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997698,0.001360492,0.00005876265,0.00008993382,0.0006095581,0.0001832228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919258,0.006287736,0.0005440007,0.0002256042,0.0007548155,0.0002620934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004738886,0.001239092,0.043048,0.0008514008,0.0008104646,0.0009044576,0.0002344261,0.7448092,0.003810037,0.1080741,0.005336547,0.08614352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007630924,0.003332003,0.09632201,0.0002526482,0.00112617,0.0005024749,0.001266915,0.8018138,0.003994755,0.0724388,0.01803156,0.0001557603],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9173472,0.003101408,0.009421266,0.002602913,0.00008240622,0.0002474235,0.001294662,0.000034521,0.06586814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965437,0.0004616561,0.0008341792,0.00003689061,0.00002631316,0.00003334916,0.0001802594,0.00000458664,0.001879104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01670207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04809272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06507472808022119,"score_gpt":0.2004745217590209,"score_spread":0.1353997936787997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}