{"id":"W2155115835","doi":"10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00202.x","title":"An economic evaluation of the environmental benefits from pesticide reduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Pesticide; Contingent valuation; Valuation (finance); Agriculture; Damages; Cost–benefit analysis; Willingness to pay; Economics; Natural resource economics; Pesticide residue; Business; Agricultural economics; Geography; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000492473,0.0001849782,0.0002816447,0.00004644795,0.0001367628,0.0000446985,0.0003143072,0.0001178625,0.001590392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001170428,0.0001618355,0.0001521324,0.00003808213,0.00009006333,0.000710441,0.00005991018,0.00009815236,0.000697985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008934476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001790487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005892291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001332349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985464,0.00004198722,0.000712258,0.0004623347,0.00003844016,0.0001985743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988497,0.00002177662,0.0006276328,0.0004196345,0.000007253718,0.00007394238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002214227,0.0001964147,0.7384679,0.000003152402,0.0001295783,8.719847e-8,0.0006550343,0.2255618,0.001505763,0.02432762,0.0002418063,0.008888702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005817896,0.00003942714,0.9727193,0.000005465683,0.00004306123,0.00001035947,0.0003927686,0.01567642,0.001101845,0.008788647,0.0004052367,0.0002357165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948382,0.0005367799,0.0000151142,0.0002801197,0.0008354147,0.0003537846,0.0003217942,0.00001608125,0.002802761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985939,0.0004941997,0.0001420521,0.00004492397,0.0002645013,0.00003421353,0.0002797778,0.00001796709,0.000128449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2342514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06507472808022119,"score_gpt":0.2004745217590209,"score_spread":0.1353997936787997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}