{"id":"W2155160774","doi":"10.1017/beq.2015.2","title":"Agonistic Pluralism and Stakeholder Engagement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Pluralism (philosophy); Agonism; Power (physics); Stakeholder engagement; Stakeholder analysis; Context (archaeology); Agonistic behaviour; Stakeholder theory; Public relations; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003646462,0.0002563707,0.0002923434,0.0002022635,0.0003812145,0.0008270046,0.0001998152,0.0002133328,0.00004299997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00323341,0.0002502996,0.00004475011,0.0007529317,0.0002143419,0.001020262,0.0001258923,0.0006030848,0.0001587984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007168568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003368211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002219838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006856199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978589,0.00008000268,0.0005165402,0.000456981,0.0007073019,0.0003803009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973311,0.000262,0.0004337289,0.0003877022,0.001537131,0.0000483806],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008735782,0.000851377,0.07722076,0.00325659,0.0002721956,0.001182553,0.03730975,0.0002549644,0.003568384,0.517086,0.01593543,0.3421884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00462714,0.0001607691,0.2511406,0.0004627809,0.000433934,0.00005965189,0.02836066,0.003598621,0.00003118531,0.3314485,0.377055,0.002621186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740428,0.0001660945,0.002273715,0.01091298,0.001175964,0.0004916391,0.000003241109,0.000359045,0.01057454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958412,0.000004078111,0.0003182775,0.002158801,0.001012734,0.00002555143,0.0000325465,0.00004573072,0.0005610565],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3611195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2236061578970691,"score_gpt":0.3159893962055023,"score_spread":0.09238323830843317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}