{"id":"W2155211375","doi":"10.3832/ifor1257-007","title":"Assessing the carbon sink of afforestation with the Carbon Budget Model at the country level: an example for Italy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; European Commission","keywords":"Reforestation; Afforestation; Carbon accounting; Carbon sink; Environmental science; Stock (firearms); Greenhouse gas; Forestry; Sink (geography); Forest inventory; Geography; Forest management; Climate change; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001739315,0.0009007405,0.0006419717,0.001054608,0.0003663462,0.00120694,0.0008545577,0.001099983,0.001711998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002912516,0.0002852529,0.001681031,0.001946626,0.0004995417,0.001004426,0.001062224,0.0008610566,0.0002208073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001474441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008143387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05580516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02265306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996802,0.0001644882,0.0000133512,0.00006909092,0.00002048574,0.00005238175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990314,0.0006018716,0.000112008,0.0001061569,0.000101812,0.00004661176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002094168,0.0001339181,0.09377822,0.0002405857,0.0004218241,0.0007612534,0.0001691064,0.8768457,0.0009027365,0.01330921,0.00320534,0.01002263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009799242,0.0001155503,0.06397322,0.00009563702,0.0002934665,0.0002062313,0.0002107829,0.9230505,0.0005399683,0.0068834,0.004463953,0.00006928204],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9581212,0.002046317,0.01639218,0.001387862,0.00006121551,0.00008036182,0.002199995,0.0002060044,0.01950483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871589,0.0007900294,0.008806026,0.0001384165,0.00005654635,0.00008043872,0.001511953,0.00009135299,0.001366267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05580516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1109607,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02259199753741321,"score_gpt":0.244400189412056,"score_spread":0.2218081918746427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}