{"id":"W2155211375","doi":"10.3832/ifor1257-007","title":"Assessing the carbon sink of afforestation with the Carbon Budget Model at the country level: an example for Italy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; European Commission","keywords":"Reforestation; Afforestation; Carbon accounting; Carbon sink; Environmental science; Stock (firearms); Greenhouse gas; Forestry; Sink (geography); Forest inventory; Geography; Forest management; Climate change; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001620183,0.0002104665,0.0001809412,0.0000267065,0.0007545005,0.0002313417,0.0006229955,0.00008365657,0.00000564569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005969594,0.00008940526,0.00004272865,0.0003358361,0.001655855,0.0003935593,0.0001720523,0.0001159648,0.00000122791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006381695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000445939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02554612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03777371,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981934,0.0001187982,0.0002399239,0.0004435438,0.0005895234,0.000414849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985902,0.0004809442,0.000272457,0.0005449783,0.0000244031,0.00008703608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001141354,0.0001229872,0.9320623,0.0001059427,0.00002981608,0.000002002065,0.003982871,0.04028521,0.008780366,0.003576841,0.000429577,0.01050796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002303004,0.0003032915,0.2262863,0.00002506473,0.00003414778,0.00001620728,0.0008234982,0.7694618,0.0005396741,0.001312003,0.0008036799,0.0001640678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957408,0.00006228515,0.001447021,0.000555583,0.0001334058,0.0006470114,0.00004499712,0.00002281626,0.001346037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991498,0.00000744827,0.0003710251,0.0001544132,0.00006802999,0.00007645382,0.00001913707,0.00001926673,0.000134411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7291765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02259199753741321,"score_gpt":0.244400189412056,"score_spread":0.2218081918746427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}