{"id":"W2155248108","doi":"10.1117/1.jrs.8.083611","title":"Light backscattering in turbid freshwater: a laboratory investigation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Remote Sensing","topic":"Marine and coastal ecosystems","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Silt; Backscatter (email); Sediment; Particle size; Distilled water; Particle (ecology); Deposition (geology); Mineralogy; Particulates; Refractive index; Environmental science; Light scattering; In situ; Materials science; Scattering; Chemistry; Geology; Optics; Physics; Geomorphology; Chromatography; Oceanography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006714463,0.00009354646,0.0002037895,0.0001660098,0.0000452604,0.0000588652,0.00008501905,0.00005420844,0.000052232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002167869,0.00007453298,0.0000352132,0.0001985318,0.00001403426,0.0001227615,0.000009820489,0.0002165221,0.00003805185],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001180954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003988772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006364576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007424079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990839,0.00005461602,0.0003900204,0.000102654,0.0001998955,0.0001689522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946,0.00004841769,0.0002450881,0.00009533022,0.00005000657,0.0001011767],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000166239,0.000006922187,0.008259879,0.0001285439,0.00003068412,0.0001116277,0.001271913,0.005960586,0.0643229,0.00004256456,0.0009269163,0.9187712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002848262,0.0004688236,0.06024168,0.001029292,0.00005468351,0.0006840529,0.001989381,0.6599335,0.07010704,0.0124627,0.1891045,0.001076074],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.976353,0.00004036213,0.0006719719,0.000332548,0.0003270014,0.00005243811,0.000001323241,0.000009679066,0.02221161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918221,0.000008935156,0.007403017,0.0003432443,0.0003991076,2.2268e-9,0.000003122586,0.000004185379,0.0000163467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9176952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.414281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006490599615921465,"score_gpt":0.1753013052977563,"score_spread":0.1688107056818348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}