{"id":"W2155279281","doi":"10.4141/cjas-2014-038","title":"Review: Canadian beef grading – Opportunities to identify carcass and meat quality traits valued by consumers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","topic":"Meat and Animal Product Quality","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Alberta; Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Grading (engineering); Business; Agricultural science; Beef industry; Population; Beef cattle; Quality (philosophy); Meat packing industry; Marketing; Biology; Food science; Animal science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004540763,0.0001533854,0.0003210678,0.00008943282,0.000873193,0.0002547216,0.0006156901,0.00004905966,0.0002142191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001311315,0.00007509725,0.00007365027,0.0004870017,0.00055352,0.0004326105,0.00002472614,0.0002085987,0.000008022233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001595472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006928539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.322172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6133031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979602,0.0002488849,0.0004501776,0.0003128803,0.0003783653,0.0006495657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961439,0.0001048018,0.0001830243,0.00005719883,0.0003660913,0.003144926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000214858,0.00001065358,0.01519201,0.00008491106,0.00001332433,0.00003431275,0.0005543543,2.018294e-7,0.8843829,0.003684666,0.03671761,0.05930353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001145011,0.0007169732,0.7322201,0.0004203836,0.00003204465,0.0001371324,0.001219092,0.000008152635,0.002373893,0.0002795534,0.2620398,0.000438323],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812446,0.003499451,0.000001838356,0.01329004,0.0001522021,0.000134108,0.00007157656,0.000005574686,0.001600662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945019,0.0002524986,0.0000623231,0.004984723,0.000125166,9.698389e-7,0.000002906131,0.000001220927,0.00006831624],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.882009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6823418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.130541597847859,"score_gpt":0.3206613175248393,"score_spread":0.1901197196769803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}