{"id":"W2155298275","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2004.052","title":"Feasibility of Stormwater Treatment by Conventional and Lamellar Settling With and Without Polymeric Flocculant Addition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Urban Stormwater Management Solutions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Stormwater; Clarifier; Settling; Flocculation; Surface runoff; Suspended solids; Environmental science; Environmental engineering; Total suspended solids; Water quality; Waste management; Chemistry; Sewage treatment; Wastewater; Engineering; Chemical oxygen demand","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001754264,0.0001345995,0.0001885269,0.00007990684,0.0004223782,0.00009425911,0.0001124014,0.00004252917,0.0005797048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001409302,0.00008065342,0.00004665283,0.00009942267,0.0007948653,0.0003494929,0.0001621704,0.0002164657,0.00003180197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004987709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002313546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001219996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001318453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977971,0.0003878108,0.0003049966,0.000296499,0.0007816716,0.0004318783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994649,0.00002675182,0.00007077908,0.0001851534,0.00003910691,0.0002133516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004670587,0.0006452368,0.8997098,0.00005065648,0.0001938405,0.00002139148,0.003517554,0.0002043885,0.09299197,0.0001515602,0.001005612,0.00104094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01523305,0.003794599,0.8271249,0.0002368297,0.0001633166,0.0007395486,0.00283248,0.0002351971,0.1209327,0.01137489,0.01629498,0.001037544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972745,0.0001136399,0.001043394,0.000986486,0.00002147656,0.0002833904,0.00005119266,0.00001150054,0.0002144388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983778,0.00009634886,0.0008895015,0.0000253547,0.00002956951,0.00001377223,0.00003863342,0.00001084812,0.0005181534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07258489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6347361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09239929035355147,"score_gpt":0.3609088953698072,"score_spread":0.2685096050162558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}