{"id":"W2155435863","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2365844","title":"Judicial Review and Parliamentary Debate: Enriching the Doctrine of Due Deference","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Doctrine; Judicial deference; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03528577,0.0005264771,0.002074892,0.003011556,0.009027358,0.01818019,0.004281836,0.01953224,0.007331023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1152689,0.0007625591,0.0014603,0.00306522,0.0400953,0.01928008,0.008731304,0.01328595,0.0007215322],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008710454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01620933,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009456113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009264226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9568617,0.02787896,0.001263198,0.003776828,0.005797679,0.0044216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8601931,0.1182589,0.004974077,0.008190922,0.006479512,0.001903468],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008405796,0.000006877066,0.00005572833,0.00001456368,0.00000261352,0.00002716775,0.000448546,0.0001810737,0.00002031321,0.9972697,0.0006956233,0.001269261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001772514,0.00000756909,0.0001391841,0.00004881314,0.000008678815,0.0000231151,0.0001882531,0.0007674521,0.00005249276,0.9913113,0.00742382,0.00001156765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06817893,0.01898095,0.09824917,0.1752301,0.002771311,0.00009319576,0.0001182195,0.0001091009,0.636269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732113,0.001984828,0.004842331,0.00631394,0.002166733,0.0000734708,0.0000191122,0.00005309535,0.01133525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03528577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1866112,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01288478435106264,"score_gpt":0.2738509074708854,"score_spread":0.2609661231198227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}