{"id":"W2155435863","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2365844","title":"Judicial Review and Parliamentary Debate: Enriching the Doctrine of Due Deference","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Doctrine; Judicial deference; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Law and economics; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00141256,0.00006070047,0.0001236864,0.0000201237,0.0004212327,0.00003608512,0.0002267768,0.00001272544,0.0001773093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000166285,0.00003789367,0.0000425986,0.00008570429,0.0001557228,0.0001674303,0.0000416148,0.0004769863,0.00002730552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001257417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003153557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002867931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004459188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987811,0.000178423,0.0001895277,0.00007380539,0.0002205245,0.0005565886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995887,0.00008810144,0.000127925,0.0000496627,0.0001100775,0.0000355191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006082051,0.00002824519,0.003027417,0.00002198954,0.0001661095,0.000001335435,0.001074879,5.515695e-7,0.00007662507,0.9268487,0.002847342,0.06590072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009916802,0.0006602737,0.03793586,0.0008528896,0.000444411,0.0003611763,0.02354332,0.00001559158,0.00007769553,0.6690793,0.2654659,0.0005718541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5344651,0.3064528,0.000401485,0.03607903,0.0003658471,0.0006131598,0.000002408902,0.00003044804,0.1215897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7389008,0.2593438,0.00001593365,0.0006795446,0.0001594737,0.000002724097,2.910006e-7,0.000003233249,0.0008942252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2626186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4335473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01288478435106264,"score_gpt":0.2738509074708854,"score_spread":0.2609661231198227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}