{"id":"W2155491988","doi":"10.1080/713608373","title":"A Framework for Human Relevance Analysis of Information on Carcinogenic Modes of Action","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":442,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Comparability; Relevance (law); Risk assessment; Animal testing; Risk analysis (engineering); Human studies; Medicine; Computer science; Toxicology; Biology; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1834226,0.003319065,0.003393878,0.01894692,0.005639587,0.01728076,0.009188543,0.01230722,0.01041275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1691208,0.002175133,0.007564866,0.008385504,0.02835471,0.01940526,0.009882659,0.009919657,0.002177181],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01589836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02857195,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02891836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01067372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8299283,0.1271704,0.01075514,0.01020246,0.01873709,0.003206626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7142253,0.2434412,0.007309499,0.01141725,0.02130927,0.002297509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003262072,0.00003996248,0.0003493315,0.0005188172,0.00006909383,0.0002799114,0.001407339,0.00291776,0.0001517516,0.9714521,0.003643773,0.0191376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000534106,0.00009606146,0.0003851627,0.00121269,0.0001069372,0.0002655146,0.0008095202,0.005129935,0.0003222829,0.9284548,0.06307968,0.00008406178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002059975,0.00644447,0.9103488,0.02545686,0.0004965095,0.002104303,0.001007257,0.0003720502,0.05170966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07785188,0.003364765,0.9027503,0.005536593,0.001204035,0.004407014,0.001229074,0.0001460424,0.003510329],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1834226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9700428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1264306380210626,"score_gpt":0.4728438992751504,"score_spread":0.3464132612540878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}