{"id":"W2155535568","doi":"10.1002/app.1448","title":"Local polydispersity detection in size exclusion chromatography: Method assessment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Polymer Science","topic":"Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dispersity; Size-exclusion chromatography; Polymer; Dispersion (optics); Light scattering; Materials science; Calibration curve; Chromatography; Chemistry; Scattering; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Polymer chemistry; Optics; Organic chemistry; Physics; Detection limit; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007484081,0.0001761707,0.0002965321,0.0002361083,0.0002266499,0.00006255336,0.0005869193,0.000116386,0.0005292292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001028236,0.0001520468,0.0001935441,0.001521452,0.0005093631,0.0002657897,0.0001213834,0.0004804702,0.000003154192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001697095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002059722,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003661465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008605126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979584,0.00001231111,0.0004910218,0.000296218,0.0008398818,0.000402165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989516,0.0001209639,0.000316424,0.00023787,0.00008263005,0.0002904914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001212055,0.0001788149,0.002628432,0.00002343156,0.00002052751,0.00005318171,0.0001270716,0.00002779103,0.978381,0.0003488392,0.00001056696,0.01807909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006698366,0.00003408528,0.00386683,0.00004393298,0.00003563687,0.0002502425,0.00101898,0.001481788,0.9915202,0.0006109853,0.0002793777,0.0001880773],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9460428,0.0002016832,0.01483779,0.0001259126,0.00006163732,0.00002569461,0.000001175862,0.00002185714,0.03868144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974208,0.00004362773,0.002282915,0.0001014221,0.0000946505,0.000001633122,2.871606e-7,0.000008494935,0.00004614325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05137802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6200288,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007023511394468785,"score_gpt":0.2723351304755677,"score_spread":0.265311619081099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}