{"id":"W2155586449","doi":"10.1109/ccece.2002.1013024","title":"A quality assessment model for Java code","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Java; Reusability; Quality (philosophy); Code (set theory); Interoperability; Software quality; JavaScript; Relation (database); Data mining; Programming language; Operating system; Software development; Software; Set (abstract data type)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006343558,0.001042302,0.0004274778,0.003624725,0.0006206551,0.003426782,0.001862554,0.001542663,0.004205188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02307112,0.0003922801,0.001490708,0.001985563,0.001186873,0.004594151,0.001153977,0.001349176,0.001748226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002938579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002633298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006997269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005211548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944501,0.001494293,0.0005640899,0.0007160708,0.002539998,0.00023546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868548,0.006391166,0.001612793,0.0008899132,0.004055323,0.0001960219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001299287,0.0002279711,0.006399184,0.0004105853,0.0001049549,0.0002827719,0.001299061,0.409947,0.003833418,0.4019551,0.006799845,0.1686103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002403218,0.0001254036,0.001299799,0.000103239,0.00003726083,0.0001283732,0.00009700702,0.8793425,0.0007635004,0.1067452,0.01129816,0.0000355342],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.007963097,0.0001722449,0.9827011,0.0006987469,0.00002492864,0.0002313168,0.0003613677,0.0007206443,0.007126514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.309231,0.0005406648,0.6771197,0.0002250853,0.00006229155,0.001725703,0.00152151,0.0002522901,0.009321754],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006997269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03354836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1175190920541189,"score_gpt":0.4037047127958799,"score_spread":0.286185620741761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}