{"id":"W2155682368","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19871.x","title":"Quantifying trait selection driving community assembly: a test in herbaceous plant communities under contrasted land use regimes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oikos","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Herbaceous plant; Trait; Selection (genetic algorithm); Plant community; Ecology; Test (biology); Biology; Geography; Ecological succession; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006495525,0.0005434034,0.0006149157,0.001110267,0.0007718657,0.0006619737,0.0005983427,0.0007065564,0.0005597939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01419474,0.000335214,0.001243162,0.0005551883,0.001097561,0.00101845,0.001095243,0.0007219772,0.0001620796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004853917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004262304,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002353618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002733819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973528,0.001627894,0.0001258759,0.0005055427,0.0002703508,0.0001175035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810032,0.01539777,0.001549305,0.0009265015,0.000643182,0.0004801241],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00101523,0.0002945652,0.7918759,0.0002140411,0.001119378,0.0002575894,0.001847667,0.01961813,0.1397226,0.0004865456,0.00007978171,0.04346858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000758751,0.001180659,0.8059521,0.00001369647,0.0001426121,0.0002595296,0.0004173189,0.1776918,0.01299045,0.00105525,0.0001474149,0.00007319182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.986094,0.00002472691,0.01365022,0.00001650816,0.000001118114,0.00001739653,0.00004729913,0.0000345564,0.0001139763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882756,0.00001063965,0.01138201,0.00001967704,0.000004224657,0.00003869124,0.0001953195,0.00001806252,0.0000557696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006495525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1979687656234219,"score_gpt":0.2482158220786535,"score_spread":0.05024705645523156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}