{"id":"W2155764098","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040461","title":"Party Structure and Backbench Dissent in the Canadian and British Parliaments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Political science; Ideology; Humanities; House of Commons; Voting; Ligne; Ethnology; Sociology; Politics; Law; Parliament; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001217956,0.00005345991,0.00009785759,0.0001174529,0.0007399412,0.0005045107,0.0002311559,0.00005477609,0.0001149912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006799643,0.00004246867,0.00001510536,0.0003053111,0.001467005,0.0003319507,0.000005645952,0.0001785776,0.000002044774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000652239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003155432,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9822754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982591,0.0001233104,0.0002059556,0.000106751,0.0003296639,0.0009752736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970577,0.0000792457,0.0000364688,0.00005656415,0.0001094939,0.002660495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[5.154518e-7,0.000004248576,0.243862,0.00000307796,0.00000142089,0.00003967915,0.003234593,0.00000184729,0.00001368389,0.7498335,0.0004842377,0.002521165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008646322,0.00003206938,0.9728492,0.00003374208,0.000004961071,0.00006693406,0.0009262948,0.0000283347,0.00001089343,0.01306522,0.01282168,0.00007424023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674944,0.0001283185,0.000001179063,0.02917863,0.0001118399,0.00008309917,0.00001363945,9.758138e-7,0.002987863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983012,0.000002595392,0.00003976588,0.001310672,0.0002727674,7.899066e-7,2.313189e-7,0.000002074222,0.00006988221],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7367683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5691104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02500491559871101,"score_gpt":0.3215464135515017,"score_spread":0.2965414979527907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}