{"id":"W2155798268","doi":"10.1136/bmj.g5630","title":"A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1820,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Cancer Care Ontario; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; Health Sciences Centre; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Quality of evidence; Psychological intervention; Econometrics; Statistics; Medicine; Mathematics; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8501170463277544,"score_gpt":0.5684117375915677,"score_spread":0.2817053087361867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}