{"id":"W2155871067","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2004.016","title":"Summary of Case Studies Investigating the Causes of Pulp and Paper Mill Effluent Regulatory Toxicity","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Newfoundland and Labrador","keywords":"Daphnia magna; Rainbow trout; Effluent; Toxicant; Toxicity; Daphnia; Paper mill; Acute toxicity; Trout; Biology; Toxicology; Cladocera; Pollutant; Pulp mill; Environmental chemistry; Fishery; Pulp and paper industry; Chemistry; Ecology; Environmental science; Environmental engineering; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Crustacean; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003957412,0.001046294,0.0006347504,0.007811364,0.002404775,0.00163257,0.001173048,0.00150608,0.002776794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009835496,0.0005582487,0.001252459,0.004984797,0.001187091,0.001155174,0.001822207,0.000790059,0.0004212309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00213989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002428054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01040743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01321021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951367,0.001750423,0.0009146855,0.0004874919,0.001179066,0.0005317616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884913,0.004770517,0.003320827,0.0006973636,0.002138786,0.0005813451],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006783507,0.000685176,0.6736508,0.003823956,0.0005487737,0.2342307,0.007658455,0.001180236,0.005606934,0.00145086,0.003833751,0.06665204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008024691,0.001953429,0.4244663,0.005695973,0.001625042,0.4371375,0.04046067,0.002007823,0.02454557,0.002041693,0.05975996,0.000225712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560226,0.01546691,0.005066652,0.0007337898,0.0001070484,0.001466369,0.002169746,0.00009072715,0.01887608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756182,0.0158309,0.004121286,0.0004207566,0.00005126722,0.0002605049,0.001388611,0.00002944798,0.002279045],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01040743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02092904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1311049997218608,"score_gpt":0.3925211775925613,"score_spread":0.2614161778707006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}