{"id":"W2155895624","doi":"10.1007/s10926-011-9326-0","title":"Predicting Return to Work in Workers with All-Cause Sickness Absence Greater than 4 Weeks: A Prospective Cohort Study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","topic":"Workplace Health and Well-being","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars","keywords":"Sick leave; Medicine; Proportional hazards model; Health psychology; Hazard ratio; Public health; Cohort; Cohort study; Prospective cohort study; Occupational safety and health; Rehabilitation; Physical therapy; Demography; Gerontology; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001795085,0.0004689548,0.0004040317,0.000568327,0.0007605956,0.0009206355,0.0006487488,0.0007140923,0.001653285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002409585,0.0006015546,0.00113595,0.0007155055,0.0002458317,0.0005006922,0.0005922447,0.001114993,0.0004466727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002654765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006337913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0130575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01516326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999366,0.0001622304,0.00005324499,0.0001522074,0.0001071563,0.0001592814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981623,0.0002533299,0.0006217802,0.0003044073,0.0002044544,0.0004538489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002307757,0.0001057587,0.9988719,0.000007533938,0.00007184099,0.00003923661,0.00006762057,0.00001970269,0.0001098814,0.000005284978,0.00007147225,0.0003990683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003022334,0.0002983025,0.9990293,0.00001293516,0.00006356486,0.00008762678,0.0001720789,0.0001381936,0.00002215894,0.00001114508,0.0001282616,0.00000617902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991484,0.0001498026,0.00007585809,0.0000258332,0.000009957346,0.00001909408,0.0004548355,0.000002017521,0.0001140877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989073,0.0001405153,0.0001213258,0.00003032806,0.00001038564,0.0000256862,0.0005128708,0.000002189495,0.0002493212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0130575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02596301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04869925513927505,"score_gpt":0.3875451971283808,"score_spread":0.3388459419891058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}