{"id":"W2155895624","doi":"10.1007/s10926-011-9326-0","title":"Predicting Return to Work in Workers with All-Cause Sickness Absence Greater than 4 Weeks: A Prospective Cohort Study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","topic":"Workplace Health and Well-being","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars","keywords":"Sick leave; Medicine; Proportional hazards model; Health psychology; Hazard ratio; Public health; Cohort; Cohort study; Prospective cohort study; Occupational safety and health; Rehabilitation; Physical therapy; Demography; Gerontology; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00353597,0.0001915289,0.0003807743,0.0004484126,0.0002830237,0.00001362396,0.0001726089,0.0001288388,0.0001211101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001641538,0.0001451845,0.00005999982,0.0008462359,0.00005267069,0.0004875177,0.0000413189,0.0008195413,0.00003540095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007114156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006804976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003678687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008892126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964504,0.0007975915,0.001230828,0.0003110285,0.0007753883,0.0004347144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996316,0.001399613,0.0008050062,0.0002241095,0.0009904747,0.0002647861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007803089,0.0002449222,0.9223085,0.00006490332,0.00008950558,0.00001989309,0.06875955,0.0001652485,0.000003802649,0.00006722818,0.000280766,0.0001925803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001547405,0.001844464,0.971573,0.001174507,0.00005878101,0.000005405771,0.02317057,0.00004197682,0.000002733859,0.0004174374,0.00002329685,0.0001404474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945945,0.0000127234,0.0008225696,0.0005368,0.0004413917,0.002792026,0.000002687002,0.00002524999,0.0007720895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882593,0.000001998632,0.01093022,0.0002027549,0.0002369081,0.0002175668,0.000003275707,0.00002774005,0.0001202293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04926447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5920453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04869925513927505,"score_gpt":0.3875451971283808,"score_spread":0.3388459419891058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}