{"id":"W2155945500","doi":"10.1080/10556780903334682","title":"Robust portfolio selection based on a joint ellipsoidal uncertainty set","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Optimization methods & software","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Portfolio; Robust optimization; Selection (genetic algorithm); Ellipsoid; Mathematics; Portfolio optimization; Mathematical optimization; Modern portfolio theory; Set (abstract data type); Project portfolio management; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Financial economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006457625,0.001467067,0.002247549,0.001965337,0.0005354763,0.002565029,0.001708582,0.001298591,0.002148325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01351757,0.001031696,0.001897298,0.001825244,0.00161572,0.003273715,0.00315191,0.002115557,0.0003641178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001382828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009911333,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002340218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009793573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949267,0.002250569,0.000220456,0.0006729375,0.001581309,0.0003479241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919605,0.005791228,0.0008187787,0.0004042937,0.0007762101,0.0002490194],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001032086,0.00002446194,0.0006496951,0.00007608577,0.0000978529,0.0001488948,0.00007793764,0.8661999,0.0008655734,0.1120565,0.0007385412,0.01896134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000793893,0.00002808961,0.0001205376,0.00001316423,0.00001184542,0.0000309627,0.000007457629,0.9704481,0.0002592742,0.0287485,0.0003114574,0.00001262616],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01378433,0.0003746914,0.9833289,0.0001512169,0.00001380325,0.00002714639,0.0000541073,0.00005049313,0.002215156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7957404,0.001460227,0.1977138,0.0002176177,0.0001274773,0.0002916899,0.000475602,0.00007522509,0.003897899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006457625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03415161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1339619415614735,"score_gpt":0.405099374543439,"score_spread":0.2711374329819656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}