{"id":"W2155996729","doi":"10.18438/b8ms3d","title":"Effective Methods for Teaching Information Literacy Skills to Undergraduate Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Meta-analysis; Critical appraisal; Information literacy; Inclusion and exclusion criteria; Relevance (law); Data extraction; Computer science; Critical thinking; Teaching method; Medical education; Mathematics education; Psychology; MEDLINE; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Library science; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009987609,0.0005590963,0.003162265,0.001436134,0.001049008,0.004961534,0.0008830128,0.0002469379,0.0001033447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01315232,0.0004050784,0.0009980608,0.002714687,0.0001338607,0.6483755,0.0002615523,0.0004717149,0.000092832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000692723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000494151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004770247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.485652e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907094,0.005035793,0.002658611,0.0003420334,0.0008212872,0.0004328395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812272,0.01440903,0.003122798,0.0005706699,0.0003072104,0.0003631106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002381934,0.0000621564,9.677399e-7,0.6464992,0.01211256,4.909197e-7,0.003837121,0.00002102222,5.002745e-9,0.1734699,0.003729549,0.1602432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008179511,0.00007834438,0.000002474957,0.0183755,0.1695084,0.000004851748,0.0003275291,0.00009778007,2.298532e-7,0.00008211824,0.8110526,0.0003883417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[7.408686e-8,0.898533,0.0537966,0.03506266,0.0001037332,0.0106667,0.0001792628,0.0001600529,0.001497952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000001269247,0.8189804,0.0420194,0.1351754,0.00004693031,0.002460529,0.0005775481,0.000012875,0.0007256633],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8073231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03315069923086385,"score_gpt":0.4501357496774183,"score_spread":0.4169850504465545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}