{"id":"W2155996729","doi":"10.18438/b8ms3d","title":"Effective Methods for Teaching Information Literacy Skills to Undergraduate Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Meta-analysis; Critical appraisal; Information literacy; Inclusion and exclusion criteria; Relevance (law); Data extraction; Computer science; Critical thinking; Teaching method; Medical education; Mathematics education; Psychology; MEDLINE; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Library science; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02745686,0.003326294,0.01969785,0.01580822,0.001059906,0.004818395,0.003094621,0.002974389,0.004001975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06458382,0.002016609,0.02927201,0.0111038,0.001377716,0.003811856,0.002199853,0.002006261,0.0003148033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005320991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01010608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006035407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01822512,"domain_scores_codex":[0.980771,0.008357467,0.005903982,0.001167314,0.003360047,0.0004402043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557806,0.03237557,0.006943226,0.0008348625,0.003532269,0.000533477],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001183847,0.0001074379,0.001597356,0.8408817,0.1247508,0.0001051998,0.0002352354,0.0002398169,0.0002165982,0.0001558348,0.0003677939,0.0301584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001514616,0.001072044,0.004164055,0.3083692,0.6800198,0.0002211117,0.0003888787,0.0002608863,0.0004613485,0.0002511057,0.003220493,0.00005638706],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004191732,0.9933561,0.0005750583,0.000187598,0.0001170421,0.001169111,0.0001859919,0.00002102408,0.0001963138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05819146,0.9331747,0.004384093,0.0005275608,0.0001413755,0.003155483,0.0002597561,0.00001502703,0.0001506006],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02745686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1452075,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03315069923086385,"score_gpt":0.4501357496774183,"score_spread":0.4169850504465545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}