{"id":"W2156068714","doi":"10.1109/itsc.2006.1707447","title":"Motion planning for autonomous rendezvous with vehicle convoys","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Robotic Path Planning Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rendezvous; Collision avoidance; Computer science; Obstacle avoidance; Obstacle; Motion planning; Matching (statistics); Collision; Trajectory; Vehicle dynamics; Simulation; Artificial intelligence; Real-time computing; Mobile robot; Engineering; Robot; Automotive engineering; Aerospace engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001985549,0.0004541784,0.0003768961,0.0002438442,0.0004295977,0.0002451953,0.0006126162,0.0002557061,0.000959634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000483246,0.0002557883,0.0002832478,0.0001884566,0.0005434321,0.0004057904,0.0006895873,0.0004074164,0.0002051187],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003460474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000520997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006358392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005700129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998291,0.00003216411,0.000006057815,0.00004966534,0.00006191169,0.00002111548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999052,0.00003242791,0.00001689001,0.00001575494,0.00001765373,0.00001200169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002398304,0.00004231156,0.0008049245,0.0001146773,0.00005093323,0.0003720546,0.0004127639,0.7831822,0.03622555,0.02483113,0.001302879,0.1524208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003466005,0.0000648295,0.0003072171,0.00000699031,0.000008640199,0.00009678,0.00005948534,0.9817208,0.007914827,0.005669957,0.004104124,0.00001167292],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04981919,0.0001971221,0.947026,0.00006381199,0.0000189605,0.00002677851,0.00002532474,0.0005121487,0.002310693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7803501,0.0001778696,0.2156111,0.00002107083,0.00001413217,0.00007955104,0.0001005915,0.00008977663,0.003555789],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006358392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01264274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01705287086522691,"score_gpt":0.2385731655979195,"score_spread":0.2215202947326926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}