{"id":"W2156096420","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.136","title":"Petroleum-contaminated groundwater remediation systems design: A data envelopment analysis based approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Expert Systems with Applications","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental remediation; Groundwater; Groundwater remediation; Environmental science; Petroleum; Computer science; Data envelopment analysis; Underground storage tank; Risk analysis (engineering); Contamination; Waste management; Engineering; Business; Mathematics; Storage tank","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004547927,0.0003748219,0.000889003,0.001476762,0.0009397523,0.0005664417,0.002475212,0.0001574715,0.00003586377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000260953,0.0002552761,0.0001512942,0.006246414,0.0002275571,0.0005708294,0.0001657538,0.000177492,0.0003392798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002854945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003626061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005213769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923964,0.0008990401,0.001539941,0.001748872,0.002917822,0.0004978864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926579,0.001025168,0.0008803309,0.00436666,0.0008122731,0.0002576846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001227997,0.001572227,0.02161433,0.00003918294,0.001669476,0.00003112222,0.00340788,0.9448987,0.001176886,0.001392086,0.02295647,0.001118797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004628021,0.00004819318,0.002223027,0.00001687558,0.0002659915,0.00004320283,0.001537174,0.9423976,0.0000750049,0.000006623415,0.05252361,0.0003998755],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00299666,0.001035923,0.9927417,0.0002292952,0.0001298578,0.001539034,0.00004134616,0.0002005522,0.00108561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730949,0.00002110895,0.02100966,0.0000881017,0.0001886167,0.002497498,0.000764004,0.00003520982,0.002300944],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9717321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1520989554292101,"score_gpt":0.3432727566623619,"score_spread":0.1911738012331518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}