{"id":"W2156144086","doi":"10.1139/t08-010","title":"Limit equilibrium slope stability analysis using rigid finite elements","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Slope stability analysis; Safety factor; Slip (aerodynamics); Slope stability; Finite element method; Limit analysis; Geology; Constraint (computer-aided design); Factor of safety; Limit (mathematics); Geotechnical engineering; Mathematics; Structural engineering; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005772416,0.0005670387,0.0005596234,0.001218204,0.0003632061,0.0006405468,0.001220179,0.000584361,0.002602647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001639358,0.0003865151,0.0009628338,0.0004020929,0.0009210338,0.0006285234,0.0009541225,0.0004719434,0.0007697205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004486531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003467982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002395551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996728,0.00006584623,0.0000185862,0.0000370307,0.0001834696,0.00002220951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996762,0.0001314252,0.00005213506,0.00005475568,0.00007626269,0.000009308026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001686894,0.00001244087,0.0003660061,0.0000539764,0.00001975289,0.00006101674,0.0001111828,0.8979016,0.007433936,0.07254243,0.0002026749,0.02127814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002079079,0.00001406064,0.00009820058,0.000009082983,0.000003853124,0.00002359085,0.0000132488,0.9871798,0.001283333,0.01002376,0.001343122,0.00000591337],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01272644,0.00009371588,0.9818664,0.00001858735,0.000008168819,0.00002408701,0.00002838607,0.0001296789,0.005104473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6310645,0.0006681521,0.3572013,0.00003569375,0.00002967651,0.0003236772,0.000206681,0.0003282322,0.01014205],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003467982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008706689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0241022876977702,"score_gpt":0.2148405530104585,"score_spread":0.1907382653126883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}