{"id":"W2156144086","doi":"10.1139/t08-010","title":"Limit equilibrium slope stability analysis using rigid finite elements","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Slope stability analysis; Safety factor; Slip (aerodynamics); Slope stability; Finite element method; Limit analysis; Geology; Constraint (computer-aided design); Factor of safety; Limit (mathematics); Geotechnical engineering; Mathematics; Structural engineering; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005354188,0.0003199581,0.0005643705,0.0009261337,0.0002864955,0.00009260532,0.000539253,0.0002962496,0.000931112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002711031,0.0003263406,0.0005808458,0.00208097,0.0001145393,0.0002073436,0.00004996891,0.001109914,0.00005256769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000723794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002713938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002473262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001174579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974507,0.00005041064,0.0007869077,0.0003215499,0.0004124142,0.0009780054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976682,0.00008354249,0.00007609971,0.0005891271,0.0001340445,0.001448953],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002490297,0.00001458284,0.0009655669,0.000009909852,0.0004940366,0.0002293373,0.00002077874,0.9957526,0.001025905,0.00001002451,0.0004386464,0.001036098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002051104,0.00003103613,0.00263537,0.00001939985,0.0004582281,0.0002010238,0.00001620066,0.9850601,0.0002917943,0.00008283685,0.01057931,0.0004195989],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5298836,0.0007372686,0.4668889,0.0003591989,0.0004040984,0.0001812638,0.0001076305,0.0006645198,0.0007734567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958807,0.0001269965,0.003545673,0.0001208367,0.0001904744,0.000004591025,0.00001800712,0.00004980031,0.0000629742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.465997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0241022876977702,"score_gpt":0.2148405530104585,"score_spread":0.1907382653126883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}