{"id":"W2156148634","doi":"10.15353/joci.v6i3.2534","title":"Flying blind, or going with the flow?: Using constructivist evaluation to manage the unexpected in the GraniteNet project","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Community Informatics","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summative assessment; Formative assessment; Project team; Action research; Participatory action research; Knowledge management; Sociology; Computer science; Pedagogy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.4686859,0.001743313,0.002257177,0.008748568,0.01309407,0.03146306,0.006792776,0.003528761,0.002325013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3745367,0.00135621,0.001464479,0.0071942,0.03287067,0.01993756,0.02142827,0.00943243,0.0005496948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03238782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06502035,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01279837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02151004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3710713,0.5844432,0.008669471,0.005189575,0.02378209,0.006844503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4638174,0.4537015,0.01962079,0.01535,0.04019205,0.007318242],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000861436,0.002452599,0.01567949,0.003856806,0.0003207564,0.0005905807,0.6708798,0.004510712,0.0007588448,0.04302979,0.006853383,0.2502057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007904078,0.002575451,0.01197404,0.009472519,0.0003344774,0.0002353781,0.8288304,0.01556687,0.004893591,0.07206511,0.05280535,0.0004564409],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6626325,0.005760021,0.182785,0.03730008,0.0008777037,0.02695774,0.0005617009,0.0007182896,0.08240711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.867318,0.001603785,0.1145689,0.00194253,0.00006936101,0.01165773,0.0002099651,0.0002279384,0.002401822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4686859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6552049,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2830983067966262,"score_gpt":0.4260498229107132,"score_spread":0.1429515161140871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}