{"id":"W2156297602","doi":"10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02315.x","title":"Distribution and abundance of trees in floodplain forests of the Wisconsin River: Environmental influences at different scales","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Floodplain; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Geography; Relative species abundance; Community structure; Flooding (psychology); Environmental science; Flood myth; Land cover; Physical geography; Land use; Biology; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003268565,0.0001284242,0.0001187273,0.0006239342,0.0002623416,0.0005630854,0.0001328992,0.0001361421,0.0006606725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008167622,0.0001240939,0.0001387558,0.0006848146,0.00025574,0.0003066252,0.0002702972,0.0001052211,0.0000724666],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002866802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001688516,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02500442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06511243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998652,0.00003940138,0.000009651211,0.00003874046,0.00001913984,0.00002776318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993433,0.0001900947,0.0002570164,0.00002897889,0.00008290284,0.00009772515],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002832054,0.000007117083,0.997936,0.000004382901,0.00002105705,0.00001430213,0.0001165945,0.00007902412,0.0006186048,0.00001002072,0.0000196357,0.001144942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.361789e-7,0.000005720093,0.9997084,0.000001622707,0.000004248773,0.00000993652,0.0001015323,0.0001069352,0.00003202551,0.000005716068,0.00002292985,7.156423e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997336,0.00003493953,0.00003196794,0.000004680312,2.631866e-7,9.724231e-7,0.00008242647,0.000001145293,0.0001099914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997185,0.00003354502,0.00004158549,0.000003034984,0.000001070345,0.000001619016,0.0001328423,6.89921e-7,0.00006704114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02500442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04971772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006588548616441998,"score_gpt":0.2232959234358984,"score_spread":0.2167073748194564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}