{"id":"W2156457189","doi":"10.18352/ijc.334","title":"Do collective property rights make sense? Insights from central Vietnam","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Commons","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Legitimacy; Bundle of rights; Law and economics; Common ownership; Property (philosophy); Common-pool resource; Public property; Land law; Business; Economic system; Right to property; Economics; Human rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Microeconomics; Land tenure; Law; Market economy; Politics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001126195,0.00008680103,0.00009335282,0.00004239585,0.0002301934,0.00005560655,0.0005824091,0.00003248732,0.0006415307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003095328,0.00004413364,0.0001286656,0.0001033876,0.00009600783,0.0001656683,0.0004502053,0.0001556242,0.00008276981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004365329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001673166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000489382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006077573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988916,0.000110465,0.0002013336,0.00007970559,0.0005749043,0.0001419895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994441,0.00005544614,0.0002170843,0.0001380469,0.00005096612,0.00009440391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000858853,0.0002724844,0.9779862,6.802089e-7,0.0002139335,0.00002003793,0.0036422,0.000352698,0.0007873565,0.00007160532,0.01523982,0.001327152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000345956,0.00001547834,0.8022997,0.00002093871,0.00003476965,0.0000276935,0.0001755275,0.0001020732,0.0004262966,0.001153197,0.1953295,0.00006887226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733811,0.00007561782,0.0001055088,0.004011712,0.001705609,0.0001041762,0.00001384349,0.000006146183,0.0205963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970004,0.000008363957,0.0001865847,0.0004554622,0.0002906994,7.945814e-7,0.000001711187,0.000003610446,0.002052403],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1800897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7024311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01608260839418343,"score_gpt":0.2131139220220708,"score_spread":0.1970313136278874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}