{"id":"W2156457189","doi":"10.18352/ijc.334","title":"Do collective property rights make sense? Insights from central Vietnam","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Commons","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Legitimacy; Bundle of rights; Law and economics; Common ownership; Property (philosophy); Common-pool resource; Public property; Land law; Business; Economic system; Right to property; Economics; Human rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Microeconomics; Land tenure; Law; Market economy; Politics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005501585,0.0002719435,0.0004406959,0.00150644,0.006196413,0.005447559,0.001159836,0.001230699,0.003739989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00784038,0.0003238614,0.0001895288,0.003277933,0.01203025,0.006110988,0.003203919,0.001448515,0.0001236674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01024426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003665322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1092534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1214632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968424,0.001737016,0.0001100743,0.0002667505,0.0003369335,0.0007069584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918034,0.005621306,0.001190164,0.0004578976,0.000544081,0.000383157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007776003,0.0001279181,0.06200168,0.0003821705,0.00003095804,0.01019322,0.6949895,0.001252232,0.0007206819,0.2036355,0.001453234,0.02513517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002797356,0.00005160895,0.03199349,0.0004950492,0.00001760084,0.000871211,0.9026474,0.001409663,0.0004010535,0.02879711,0.03326583,0.00002197595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.938966,0.0007270579,0.0006435432,0.003219842,0.00001092106,0.00004548318,0.0000574926,0.000003331203,0.05632629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987547,0.0002134838,0.0001243196,0.00006924573,0.000002515888,0.00001339727,0.00001417297,0.000002175634,0.0008060852],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1092534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2172349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01608260839418343,"score_gpt":0.2131139220220708,"score_spread":0.1970313136278874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}