{"id":"W2156498790","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100524","title":"Accessibility and transparency of editor conflicts of interest policy instruments in medical journals","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Subject (documents); The Internet; Computer science; Impact factor; Publishing; Internet privacy; Public relations; World Wide Web; Political science; Law; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02509909,0.0001768379,0.000719422,0.0002909744,0.00007351695,0.00000753328,0.0006842693,0.003464706,0.003123099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01843618,0.000136978,0.0001293529,0.0003491337,0.001140128,0.0003116886,0.0001415347,0.01421727,0.000002206236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008790565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002901051,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009063499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008017052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993105,0.00201607,0.002097354,0.0001345156,0.002124744,0.0005223151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930307,0.003024031,0.0009115593,0.0001241719,0.0005753523,0.002334137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002109685,0.004315872,0.8184355,0.003301246,0.0005051155,0.0002120444,0.01610537,0.000005897848,0.003672505,0.01254387,0.003131455,0.1356614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0332325,0.002778367,0.5919584,0.01158646,0.0008858861,0.002648572,0.004466658,0.001927626,0.07575057,0.01527843,0.2583158,0.001170725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362358,0.00313467,0.00005580335,0.05594673,0.004041869,0.0001216453,0.00003076636,0.000004561035,0.0004281743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802452,0.01027426,0.00004943951,0.004999548,0.004409256,0.000001831443,0.000001367228,0.00000895036,0.00001014184],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2551844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7590710822015326,"score_gpt":0.675394627864092,"score_spread":0.08367645433744064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}