{"id":"W2156541068","doi":"10.1109/tcomm.2009.06.070048","title":"Error rate estimation of low-density parity-check codes on binary symmetric channels using cycle enumeration","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Communications","topic":"Error Correcting Code Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Enumeration; Low-density parity-check code; Decoding methods; Binary number; Algorithm; Code (set theory); Discrete mathematics; Parity (physics); Mathematics; Word error rate; Computer science; Combinatorics; Statistics; Arithmetic; Artificial intelligence; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001131362,0.0005718019,0.0005410931,0.0009166587,0.0002877753,0.0007573586,0.000700984,0.0005917791,0.0005839148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009120594,0.0003457355,0.0002405355,0.0007983959,0.0006076703,0.001125412,0.0009307811,0.0005442898,0.0002771821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008887021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001180055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003084002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002336704,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991931,0.0003796527,0.00003176499,0.00006704062,0.0002458316,0.00008251258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966013,0.002465798,0.0002803783,0.0002546418,0.0003397852,0.00005798904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003209546,0.00004666223,0.002635739,0.00008463373,0.00002454901,0.000115203,0.00007732542,0.9212877,0.01039645,0.02848917,0.0004468258,0.03607478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003998769,0.000006104649,0.0001685344,0.000004833525,0.000001383328,0.000009173643,0.0000031508,0.9948599,0.001998413,0.00288739,0.00005193229,0.000005261101],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3172857,0.0002933683,0.6776155,0.0002506031,0.00002437195,0.0000548166,0.0001682314,0.0004647654,0.003842533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9325389,0.0002904325,0.06544276,0.00004182544,0.00001920832,0.0000661486,0.0002296598,0.00003801167,0.001333047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003084002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00644803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05348081100925509,"score_gpt":0.3259094950104341,"score_spread":0.272428684001179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}