{"id":"W2156568169","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2013-0157","title":"Computational investigation of baffle configuration on impedance of channelized debris flow","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hong Kong Government","keywords":"Baffle; Froude number; Flow (mathematics); Debris flow; Turbulence kinetic energy; Mechanics; Debris; Channelized; Supercritical flow; Flume; Turbulence; Geology; Geotechnical engineering; Environmental science; Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003753315,0.00007157181,0.0001343103,0.00007148878,0.00009491598,0.00001200234,0.0001391313,0.0001151886,0.0006976162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001011095,0.00005802249,0.00006027717,0.0001478774,0.000153853,0.00007356215,0.00001256291,0.0002170706,0.00003831063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001387065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009418306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002560148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009346943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999119,0.00006074573,0.0002948455,0.0001047535,0.0002581428,0.0001625134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993533,0.00005282672,0.0001661203,0.00009295387,0.0000343274,0.0003005023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003484353,0.00001527698,0.001968339,0.000007086206,0.00001630138,0.000005434767,0.0001339763,0.9626653,0.004054614,0.001099149,0.004733556,0.02526611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001283044,0.0005396091,0.08319427,0.0001577763,0.0000341373,0.0001317405,0.00002742896,0.8807568,0.00702325,0.01738418,0.009203291,0.0002645062],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696941,0.00002770266,0.02542567,0.002198356,0.0002035083,0.0001463324,0.00002039378,0.0000137636,0.002270202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981291,0.00001219744,0.001406793,0.0003476368,0.00004737234,0.000001258033,0.00001020688,0.00000646433,0.00003898946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08190855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7638408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007520425578207954,"score_gpt":0.2023329855185795,"score_spread":0.1948125599403715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}