{"id":"W2156641251","doi":"10.1142/s1464333203001401","title":"Learning, Public Involvement and Environmental Assessment: A Canadian Case Study","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Sustainability; Citizen journalism; Social learning; Process (computing); Public participation; Ideal (ethics); Participatory action research; Political science; Environmental planning; Process management; Sociology; Knowledge management; Public relations; Engineering; Computer science; Pedagogy; Ecology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004922322,0.0005652889,0.0004590807,0.001941491,0.030127,0.003778892,0.002263915,0.003418528,0.004432833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008212831,0.0003529756,0.0005146136,0.004348367,0.006261877,0.001758807,0.003880771,0.002625166,0.0002890393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07576619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06824388,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9691012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9867684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936774,0.002192489,0.0001229108,0.0003111771,0.001299817,0.002396133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994101,0.002876818,0.0004006075,0.0002415523,0.001097879,0.00128225],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006548495,0.004237347,0.09401917,0.0005646378,0.00006896786,0.03514944,0.6610587,0.00540253,0.002297481,0.05429556,0.01749082,0.1247604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001697209,0.0004749639,0.05332755,0.0003415358,0.00007714576,0.002586831,0.8126326,0.00418547,0.00148994,0.004186995,0.1203892,0.0001380195],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9411401,0.0005179005,0.0008330379,0.00548478,0.00003430105,0.000420148,0.0001977954,0.00002080509,0.05135109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884685,0.0006922025,0.001121175,0.0004626935,0.000009591263,0.0001110583,0.00006500102,0.00001037748,0.009059448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07576619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5497248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01390471803645512,"score_gpt":0.283415007340624,"score_spread":0.2695102893041689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}