{"id":"W2156668993","doi":"10.1152/jappl.2001.91.4.1836","title":"Comparison of lung protection strategies using conventional and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Physiology","topic":"Respiratory Support and Mechanisms","field":"Medicine","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Pulmonary compliance; Tidal volume; Mechanical ventilation; Lung; Positive end-expiratory pressure; Anesthesia; Ventilation (architecture); Oxygenation; Saline; Lung volumes; Respiratory system; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001505325,0.00007515259,0.0003353464,0.0001235368,0.00004026483,0.000004801814,0.00003011331,0.00008601923,0.00009483294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000513136,0.00006299162,0.00005836074,0.00007761056,0.00006502874,0.00008847663,0.00001001555,0.000156372,8.995995e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003349818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001383497,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004170218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.442778e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992493,0.00001875297,0.0004096827,0.00008444624,0.0001453914,0.00009237309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992288,0.00001137294,0.0005098666,0.00006444092,0.0001346765,0.00005086967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007848084,0.00009203491,0.003812716,0.00007641652,0.00006486369,0.000004208612,0.00009111135,0.0001846698,0.9899327,0.004006146,0.00002102886,0.0009292809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006213597,0.002121903,0.6375678,0.0002583549,0.0005370544,0.00049301,0.002178702,0.003871332,0.3108741,0.03384832,0.001737205,0.0002986471],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953161,0.0001370957,0.003868566,0.00001847178,0.0001939135,0.0001585386,7.232468e-7,0.000004976403,0.0003015627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982235,0.00001559879,0.001507265,0.00002476711,0.0002093638,0.000001974712,0.000003755429,0.000007019232,0.000006751565],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6790586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2568724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04339773615239273,"score_gpt":0.3306248907263443,"score_spread":0.2872271545739516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}