{"id":"W2156697525","doi":"10.1109/iros.1995.526243","title":"A constraint-satisfaction approach for 3D vision/touch-based object recognition","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Constraint satisfaction problem; Local consistency; Constraint satisfaction; Constraint (computer-aided design); Cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition; Process (computing); Artificial intelligence; Object (grammar); Computer vision; Perception; Pattern recognition (psychology); Machine learning; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001205655,0.001281906,0.001203921,0.001126644,0.001005533,0.001870613,0.003096254,0.001386195,0.005695526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002862536,0.0008202814,0.001952243,0.002569413,0.001729411,0.001867643,0.002547291,0.002278925,0.001595142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001007342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001701193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006696418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007682179,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981644,0.0003820407,0.0001227679,0.0003025008,0.0009304521,0.0000978688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988577,0.0004912554,0.00009891911,0.0002010573,0.0002853211,0.00006564801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001048098,0.0001530715,0.0005068818,0.0005880318,0.0001862448,0.0005005528,0.0002364476,0.4285159,0.02126289,0.1967702,0.01125026,0.3399248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000162389,0.00003152511,0.0001179455,0.00001997779,0.00002020014,0.0001322609,0.00003151498,0.9205521,0.004436111,0.06597761,0.008637425,0.00002713455],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004281334,0.00006600394,0.9985384,0.00006852278,0.0000108403,0.0000213658,0.00005201109,0.0001236175,0.0006911641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03673556,0.0002730474,0.9605421,0.0001490747,0.0000455485,0.0002165651,0.0003779211,0.0001292305,0.001531104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006696418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0190534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03423121467788842,"score_gpt":0.2460853442934011,"score_spread":0.2118541296155126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}