{"id":"W2156704273","doi":"10.1139/t09-144","title":"Regional-scale landslide susceptibility mapping using the weights of evidence method: an example applied to linear infrastructure","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BGC Engineering (Canada); Queen's University","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Landslide; Terrain; Scale (ratio); Geology; STREAMS; Elevation (ballistics); Bivariate analysis; Hazard; Hydrology (agriculture); Groundwater; Physical geography; Geotechnical engineering; Geomorphology; Cartography; Geography; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005923076,0.0005546752,0.0006702307,0.003086932,0.0005280798,0.001003599,0.0008830122,0.0004994801,0.001267139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01598327,0.000255422,0.001182786,0.003761652,0.0006621554,0.0007438294,0.0009964658,0.0006245078,0.0001241563],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009001305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00116914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02317451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02410622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998117,0.001250538,0.00008296993,0.0001838709,0.0002814516,0.00008430192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904399,0.007816607,0.0005854849,0.0004848482,0.0005565488,0.0001165264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002661327,0.0002051557,0.1259212,0.0002553704,0.0008004655,0.0009447235,0.0007476198,0.639752,0.001924536,0.02532637,0.00100014,0.2028564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003741782,0.0001840007,0.02335549,0.00003099311,0.0001228672,0.0002730349,0.00037832,0.9583111,0.0006765548,0.01507606,0.001506012,0.00004822634],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3403504,0.0004394733,0.6556448,0.0003667685,0.00001325053,0.000237542,0.0004622785,0.0002865921,0.002198807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8425087,0.0002546634,0.1565635,0.00001260884,0.000006134775,0.000101641,0.0001391883,0.00003023901,0.0003833662],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9768255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04607922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04975844632845935,"score_gpt":0.2844670746358098,"score_spread":0.2347086283073505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}