{"id":"W2156712261","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.008","title":"Readers should systematically assess methods used to identify, measure and analyze confounding in observational cohort studies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Confounding; Medicine; Observational study; Propensity score matching; Cohort study; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1909558,0.00234796,0.01036451,0.01128751,0.00116557,0.005639761,0.007545784,0.008539545,0.004487496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5439762,0.002647598,0.005018492,0.006886373,0.003526443,0.01115797,0.00314471,0.009533218,0.004472448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00237447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01264927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00295571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00507527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8612526,0.09544043,0.02082977,0.00214249,0.0198821,0.0004526124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2619846,0.6717022,0.01827772,0.01169586,0.03549594,0.0008436227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000267243,0.0001353302,0.003011616,0.0892693,0.003391519,0.0002362706,0.0007596962,0.0009772178,0.0004479752,0.01236507,0.06141474,0.827724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001072718,0.0005065755,0.01151134,0.2503466,0.01239882,0.001966286,0.001441725,0.005293866,0.003108815,0.1854337,0.5263759,0.0005436281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007232743,0.8546933,0.1031731,0.03085585,0.005532067,0.001530712,0.0006931454,0.000448903,0.002349524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00662432,0.6759133,0.2941928,0.01384235,0.004490597,0.002941434,0.0004590405,0.0002099091,0.001326317],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8090442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9663047621034415,"score_gpt":0.7829941344178378,"score_spread":0.1833106276856037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}