{"id":"W2156882047","doi":"10.1175/jpo2819.1","title":"The Arctic and Subarctic Ocean Flux of Potential Vorticity and the Arctic Ocean Circulation*","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physical Oceanography","topic":"Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of Polar Programs; Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Geology; Ocean current; Climatology; Arctic; Potential vorticity; Thermohaline circulation; Boundary current; Arctic dipole anomaly; Oceanography; Isopycnal; Thermocline; Canada Basin; Vorticity; Arctic ice pack; Vortex; Meteorology; Drift ice; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002473989,0.0002761842,0.0001838449,0.0004289968,0.0001578736,0.0006271151,0.00009463203,0.000172912,0.0007730759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006555589,0.00007828418,0.0002456775,0.000422695,0.0002297131,0.0002986037,0.0002912395,0.0001810069,0.0001040725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005316987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003117402,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02715247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01684825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999537,0.00001924567,0.000002561764,0.000007012177,0.000009452155,0.00000803819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997868,0.00007933893,0.00005273059,0.00001210452,0.00003426477,0.00003491254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003570914,0.0001003398,0.6258007,0.00008639605,0.0003135063,0.0004425008,0.0001701402,0.3299229,0.01135349,0.00880051,0.001643924,0.02100858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002625968,0.00007482721,0.6447343,0.00004435382,0.00007759864,0.0001205756,0.0003315533,0.3442624,0.003580859,0.004329073,0.002382281,0.00003594713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955299,0.0003677544,0.0007866,0.0001515103,0.00002993053,0.000001072499,0.0003946486,0.0000290284,0.002709538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991376,0.000177093,0.0002346694,0.00001038696,0.00001145125,0.000001222266,0.0001542033,0.00000595483,0.0002673741],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02715247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05398887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005010890656265667,"score_gpt":0.1964029760589203,"score_spread":0.1913920854026546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}