{"id":"W2157026908","doi":"10.7202/1072322ar","title":"Rethinking Combative Dialogue: Comparative Philosophy as a Resource for Examining Models of Dialogue","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia","keywords":"Epistemology; Relevance (law); Narrative; Philosophical methodology; Frame (networking); Western philosophy; Philosophical theory; Sociology; Chinese philosophy; Resource (disambiguation); Philosophy; China; Law; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000782673,0.0001777626,0.0004694937,0.00007230162,0.0006593109,0.00002817061,0.0003765046,0.0001273654,0.00003902906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000836431,0.0001802936,0.0001606051,0.000440632,0.000462733,0.0002711572,0.00008190193,0.0001998818,0.00001934789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007244416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001445272,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005411085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981645,0.0005055981,0.0003517919,0.000361274,0.0003868056,0.0002300659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997835,0.001354222,0.0002689147,0.0001711908,0.0001753743,0.0001952739],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002519219,0.00005824619,0.000221285,0.00006251471,0.00007108501,0.000003268356,0.6076215,0.000804093,0.0002994416,0.3888867,0.001404198,0.0003157263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005666032,0.0003039399,0.00004729743,0.00007511895,0.00005852842,2.526827e-7,0.002787209,0.001796123,0.0002377692,0.9810502,0.01280723,0.0002697493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3805481,0.0009225073,0.00810546,0.0165532,0.0005177291,0.001890902,0.0003346817,0.0003460431,0.5907813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959529,0.00000913424,0.001350767,0.001704457,0.0008008009,0.00005302175,0.0000462181,0.0000183814,0.00006433699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6154048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.735216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2439471164052948,"score_gpt":0.3350808999516666,"score_spread":0.09113378354637186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}