{"id":"W2157210403","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpq028","title":"Maximum density-size relationships for Sitka spruce and coastal Douglas-fir in Britain and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Douglas fir; Hectare; Forestry; Maximum density; Boundary line; Geography; Ecology; Mathematics; Botany; Biology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001927903,0.0000962026,0.0001283458,0.0001359839,0.0002110318,0.00008497589,0.0004213287,0.00009765417,0.0001441065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001038296,0.00009023622,0.00002784097,0.00009770672,0.0003950795,0.0005186265,0.0002930621,0.000811137,0.000003996342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001418698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001528692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07425746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9048469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984646,0.0001128635,0.000314589,0.000201603,0.0006110501,0.0002953015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988033,0.0006327863,0.0001134175,0.0001268844,0.0001299475,0.0001936249],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002588203,0.00007803094,0.9793339,0.000008193065,0.00002204979,0.000170411,0.0001057499,0.0003672788,0.0001660499,0.01737419,0.001558929,0.0005563691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000823372,0.0001979515,0.937359,0.00001702752,0.000004799073,0.0002162215,0.0002188476,0.0006390203,0.000067247,0.0550391,0.005334116,0.0000833355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967882,0.000009382239,0.0001962418,0.001605152,0.0004685019,0.0002138893,0.00001617643,0.000003192103,0.0006992802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974585,0.00002614018,0.001895367,0.00007145495,0.0001826293,0.00001175652,0.000008337212,0.000009621444,0.0003361478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8305894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9319071,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02318496395794889,"score_gpt":0.3012606232266458,"score_spread":0.2780756592686969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}