{"id":"W2157235056","doi":"10.1109/tcad.2005.857314","title":"An approach for the formal verification of DSP designs using Theorem proving","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems","topic":"Embedded Systems Design Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"HOL; Computer science; Netlist; Digital signal processing; Formal verification; Automated theorem proving; Formal equivalence checking; Intelligent verification; Abstraction; Theoretical computer science; Programming language; Computer engineering; Embedded system; Computer hardware; Software development; Software","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01071969,0.001358501,0.0009380629,0.00190815,0.00149629,0.003454829,0.004012029,0.001732626,0.004317405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01420038,0.001168714,0.003729307,0.001012086,0.005427124,0.005433742,0.003102015,0.004649762,0.001415536],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001747417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004315889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001536363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001194575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9918653,0.003061181,0.0008360411,0.0008182817,0.003073326,0.0003458219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899688,0.00639818,0.0004687906,0.002198471,0.0008464296,0.0001193664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000595072,0.0001069242,0.000233111,0.0007369809,0.00009451486,0.0003125158,0.0006182284,0.0328745,0.009215922,0.8718153,0.001946971,0.08198544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001751621,0.0003022326,0.0001674188,0.0005060018,0.0001700492,0.0006332319,0.0001348374,0.1599523,0.02463084,0.7230886,0.0901218,0.0001177002],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003189528,0.00008421383,0.9984537,0.0001132279,0.00002585905,0.0000384664,0.00001682175,0.0002767904,0.0006719692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0229175,0.0005060313,0.9751049,0.0001721842,0.0000701038,0.0002265505,0.00009399121,0.0001175873,0.0007910839],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01071969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05669183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06329172596101273,"score_gpt":0.2665298651294707,"score_spread":0.203238139168458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}