{"id":"W2157240091","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v4n6p143","title":"A Study of Lexical Cohesion Theory in Reading Comprehension","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohesion (chemistry); Lexis; Reading comprehension; Computer science; Linguistics; Sentence; Empirical research; Reading (process); Psychology; Natural language processing; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001948627,0.0002825231,0.000316123,0.001278297,0.0006168158,0.001667542,0.0004419046,0.0006748462,0.002660075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01204118,0.0002021034,0.0002478134,0.0008897798,0.002217705,0.004191047,0.0008881353,0.001032114,0.0002162719],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008198961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009133731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001476077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009351973,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99897,0.0005937461,0.00004388616,0.000161329,0.000166465,0.00006443059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990218,0.008255047,0.0006228491,0.0002758652,0.0004540589,0.0001741952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003140777,0.001340966,0.1509678,0.001266609,0.0001297109,0.002109603,0.2422868,0.003510635,0.02612785,0.2609508,0.002293729,0.3087015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002966703,0.002429784,0.3949909,0.0009694642,0.0003231056,0.002157638,0.1100435,0.04526149,0.01538021,0.3863374,0.04163059,0.000179339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9255685,0.001428211,0.03009119,0.001271905,0.00005828753,0.0001186641,0.00002848667,0.00005858948,0.0413763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996024,0.0003070299,0.002552085,0.00005742918,0.00002005004,0.00004499692,0.0000158351,0.00001108864,0.0009674411],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002660075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01030546,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02715036448255153,"score_gpt":0.3368141890712395,"score_spread":0.309663824588688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}