{"id":"W2157277500","doi":"10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-3-w2-189-2015","title":"MAPPING THE RISK OF FOREST WIND DAMAGE USING AIRBORNE SCANNING LiDAR","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Academy of Finland","keywords":"Lidar; Environmental science; Taiga; Remote sensing; Boreal; Wind speed; Logistic regression; Meteorology; Geography; Forestry; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005759249,0.0003322893,0.0002184469,0.001226613,0.0002290627,0.000549624,0.0003018018,0.0002748108,0.0006096547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00138897,0.0001896684,0.0003909073,0.0008244429,0.0001475419,0.0005668424,0.0004927353,0.0001794821,0.0001465668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002543389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002876837,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007350808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00886119,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996837,0.0001043123,0.00002060038,0.00006667423,0.00008510363,0.0000395552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991328,0.0003688051,0.0002795805,0.00004841683,0.0001169944,0.00005352778],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009632325,0.00009423291,0.9226852,0.00004065104,0.00008191846,0.0003422872,0.0001494296,0.05395427,0.002775422,0.0001664134,0.0002041605,0.01940968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001484898,0.0002587435,0.6373194,0.0000287605,0.00005506825,0.0002701444,0.0005860115,0.3596146,0.0009876668,0.00048789,0.0003521863,0.00002463925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958073,0.00003578954,0.003468634,0.0000205576,0.000001666496,0.00001781849,0.0002468452,0.0000316014,0.0003697999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974701,0.00002362741,0.00219745,0.000002080268,0.000001605438,0.000009209999,0.0002102399,0.0000013235,0.00008431691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007350808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01461601,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02572601578580645,"score_gpt":0.2552204389141244,"score_spread":0.2294944231283179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}