{"id":"W2157553804","doi":"10.1186/1746-4269-8-7","title":"Traditional use of medicinal plants in the boreal forest of Canada: review and perspectives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine","topic":"Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Taiga; Boreal; Biodiversity; Agroforestry; Geography; Traditional knowledge; Medicinal plants; Documentation; Ethnobotany; Ecology; Medicine; Traditional medicine; Forestry; Biology; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001782267,0.0002329295,0.002019959,0.00004482631,0.00006174685,0.000001812397,0.0002317547,0.000222096,0.0000357045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006129058,0.00006388998,0.0001236514,0.000204685,0.0008099086,0.00006327869,0.00004633961,0.0007929406,7.745417e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002662371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001335733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01046605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07034134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979476,0.0003375735,0.001033064,0.0001540981,0.0002839916,0.00024363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949247,0.003823679,0.0009568839,0.00005064384,0.0001240691,0.0001200201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001483868,0.000317844,0.004071269,0.01483337,0.0005997639,0.0001345196,0.001807367,7.122885e-8,0.00004501309,0.0006323109,0.009325624,0.9680845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005406014,0.00241891,0.173316,0.0409597,0.002261246,0.002665134,0.005965736,2.37757e-7,6.939825e-7,0.0003763173,0.7712073,0.0002880956],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.008014333,0.9865552,1.934169e-7,0.00480576,0.0001345798,0.0002279213,0.0001415946,0.000001081355,0.0001192906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02155951,0.9775513,0.000009560963,0.0004067297,0.0004089354,0.000004374923,0.00003864211,0.000001123593,0.00001976427],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961233,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2390115900221419,"score_gpt":0.3116344969054992,"score_spread":0.07262290688335726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}