{"id":"W2157607668","doi":"10.5539/jms.v1n1p124","title":"Economic Analysis on the Tragedy of the Commons of River","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management and Sustainability","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Commons; Transaction cost; Property rights; Common-pool resource; Government (linguistics); Institution; Institutional economics; Database transaction; Exploit; Tragedy (event); Compensation (psychology); Mechanism (biology); Economics; Natural resource economics; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000846212,0.0001806577,0.0002048738,0.001087416,0.001217896,0.002247877,0.0005054565,0.001114467,0.0035471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00183595,0.0001539453,0.000451738,0.0008889299,0.003099221,0.003032113,0.001204462,0.001279042,0.00009797161],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004152993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001597317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008695681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007684716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994099,0.0002222324,0.00001804643,0.00006513947,0.0001450881,0.0001396736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991347,0.0003896564,0.0001860849,0.0000648997,0.0001294249,0.00009528927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002129676,0.00002649424,0.001896654,0.0000332093,0.00001288395,0.0002899133,0.0001907502,0.02402132,0.0003111671,0.9691785,0.001030969,0.002986935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000141973,0.00005071644,0.01218874,0.000108874,0.00004546531,0.0002620828,0.001999842,0.1641854,0.0004819498,0.8007969,0.019813,0.00005290198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5457073,0.003280965,0.09568327,0.01380756,0.0002178586,0.0001435644,0.0003055542,0.00003794613,0.340816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898282,0.000828995,0.001167982,0.0001021013,0.00005810315,0.00002157257,0.00002166523,0.000004626654,0.007966833],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008695681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03013223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008342354984795427,"score_gpt":0.1796580420886179,"score_spread":0.1713156871038224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}