{"id":"W2157628380","doi":"","title":"Assessing the Field Relevance of Testing protocols and Injury risk functions employed in new car assessment programs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury conference","topic":"Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crash; Computer security; Fuzz testing; Popularity; Crash test; Relevance (law); Certification; Poison control; Automotive industry; Government (linguistics); Engineering; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Forensic engineering; Business; Psychology; Medicine; Environmental health; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3863848,0.0007585837,0.0008874006,0.004467477,0.001396192,0.003411488,0.004734012,0.002040354,0.001714639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6401609,0.0008335441,0.001468065,0.003422098,0.00349455,0.004547778,0.003640884,0.002353367,0.0005753608],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007763481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006827139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005025873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004633127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6258506,0.2617881,0.02137463,0.01160968,0.07610251,0.003274441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2124362,0.5667746,0.07182974,0.04863669,0.09711854,0.003204277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004938173,0.003609908,0.7447046,0.001092664,0.000727176,0.0002058237,0.008165122,0.008528183,0.002945817,0.004926977,0.001865728,0.2182898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003239841,0.02291196,0.9381382,0.0006259409,0.0004414357,0.0002094408,0.006027281,0.01545985,0.004369476,0.00304733,0.008329364,0.0001156891],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8949509,0.001844018,0.05782947,0.00163572,0.0004314162,0.01841118,0.0007760854,0.0002945724,0.02382673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9556618,0.0004635104,0.03457852,0.0004775055,0.0001895383,0.006384525,0.0004405913,0.00005952633,0.0017444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3863848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7566968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1918414771231665,"score_gpt":0.4266714069194293,"score_spread":0.2348299297962628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}