{"id":"W2157727468","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.07.004","title":"Implementing the ecological approach in tobacco control programs: results of a case study","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Santé Montérégie; Nunavik Regional Board of Health and Social Services; Université de Montréal","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Implementation; Social ecological model; Public health; Conceptual framework; Control (management); Tobacco control; Population; Key (lock); Business; Management science; Process management; Environmental resource management; Knowledge management; Ecology; Computer science; Environmental health; Medicine; Engineering; Nursing; Sociology; Economics; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01047258,0.0006092405,0.0004596197,0.001399868,0.009786231,0.001614948,0.001827928,0.00236416,0.001693932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01775444,0.0004888151,0.0007381901,0.001265363,0.003253855,0.001316199,0.002829938,0.001540388,0.00020755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007685109,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02600328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07325663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9895548,0.007343458,0.0002671879,0.0002928968,0.001176283,0.001365385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917064,0.004995801,0.0007702507,0.0005749649,0.001135079,0.0008176857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002352395,0.1531552,0.2429229,0.001416753,0.0002309233,0.02181824,0.2776679,0.004268309,0.004932398,0.008133491,0.001903984,0.2811975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001224722,0.05734093,0.2686834,0.001029597,0.0007889166,0.01705754,0.60791,0.007980575,0.01205683,0.004967094,0.02067184,0.0002885108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941679,0.0001043202,0.000910932,0.0002507586,0.000007581192,0.000501829,0.00001274821,0.000009557932,0.00403429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940715,0.0003383198,0.003853103,0.000157848,0.000008020766,0.0003742549,0.00001785729,0.00000728241,0.001171603],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02600328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05538493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2835677330227286,"score_gpt":0.5551130996426561,"score_spread":0.2715453666199275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}