{"id":"W2157727468","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.07.004","title":"Implementing the ecological approach in tobacco control programs: results of a case study","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Santé Montérégie; Nunavik Regional Board of Health and Social Services; Université de Montréal","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Implementation; Social ecological model; Public health; Conceptual framework; Control (management); Tobacco control; Population; Key (lock); Business; Management science; Process management; Environmental resource management; Knowledge management; Ecology; Computer science; Environmental health; Medicine; Engineering; Nursing; Sociology; Economics; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01787816,0.000106816,0.0002126191,0.00009074755,0.001274662,0.00001962152,0.0000942029,0.00008082335,0.0000161719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007272227,0.0000710707,0.00002100115,0.0003018415,0.00003840042,0.00005748896,0.0001115444,0.0007253826,0.000002272672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001192679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004549522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001631175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002660894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957235,0.002489698,0.0007942436,0.0001955798,0.0003258512,0.0004711463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984182,0.0008332811,0.0002817248,0.0001999607,0.0001852694,0.00008156286],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002224387,0.001348486,0.6141679,0.00007749963,0.00002562335,0.00004216906,0.1129696,0.0002898108,7.640911e-7,0.0001070744,0.00004110219,0.2707076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01766819,0.001165385,0.5038977,0.0002197248,0.00005765886,0.00005699175,0.4696663,0.004205604,4.021723e-7,0.0003677358,0.002543038,0.0001512918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.987543,0.000245937,0.00008320168,0.0006953001,0.00006464669,0.009069369,0.000003192014,0.0000569222,0.002238435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994517,0.000004100634,0.002700421,0.0002891999,0.00003575315,0.002396872,0.00004206804,0.000006099798,0.000008477896],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3566967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9803802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2835677330227286,"score_gpt":0.5551130996426561,"score_spread":0.2715453666199275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}