{"id":"W2157740376","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwq495","title":"Breastfeeding and Infant Size: Evidence of Reverse Causality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Epidemiology","topic":"Breastfeeding Practices and Influences","field":"Medicine","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Breastfeeding; Medicine; Weaning; Discontinuation; Observational study; Pediatrics; Breastfeeding promotion; Infant formula; Confidence interval; Confounding; Breast feeding; Odds ratio; Affect (linguistics); Pacifier; Demography; Psychology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004670643,0.0001100589,0.0009323695,0.0000937434,0.00002824619,0.000001707137,0.0001176109,0.00005170368,0.0001495566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0153546,0.00007599816,0.0001187697,0.0001749084,0.0009732581,0.0002955798,0.00004734101,0.0003425236,0.000001902647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002435668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001150693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003282132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000854172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981421,0.0004324805,0.0009316405,0.000150287,0.0001162998,0.0002272351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933529,0.003939836,0.001995971,0.0001659878,0.0003057326,0.0002395178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001395531,0.00005463523,0.93773,0.00006116072,0.0001595171,0.00003796328,0.0006925118,0.000001535633,0.002533498,0.0005877404,0.0004999543,0.05624593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003487566,0.003253674,0.9889367,0.0005789303,0.0002281631,0.004289163,0.0005408499,0.00002067453,0.0002067002,0.0006303255,0.0008903859,0.00007573724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814757,0.002124998,0.0003329255,0.01510089,0.0001761524,0.00005895059,0.000001343938,0.000006042443,0.0007230373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714788,0.001877919,0.02456185,0.001916971,0.0001402071,7.364114e-7,8.466714e-8,0.000006660154,0.00001673316],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05617019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929395,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1089804908363931,"score_gpt":0.3817555774440726,"score_spread":0.2727750866076795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}