{"id":"W2158021437","doi":"10.1177/1049732308327883","title":"Court Reporters: A Viable Solution for the Challenges of Focus Group Data Collection?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario; University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Focus group; Jargon; Confidentiality; Data collection; Qualitative research; Diligence; Terminology; Due diligence; Qualitative property; Public relations; Receipt; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Business; World Wide Web; Computer security; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3809431,0.002462959,0.0027651,0.006539364,0.01053686,0.01121518,0.01076053,0.01525487,0.02342453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4229718,0.004015685,0.001588595,0.007553483,0.0122406,0.02789472,0.01931117,0.01073206,0.008781935],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005686786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01938148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002782369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004718685,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5176776,0.4328716,0.01258615,0.01073836,0.02307471,0.0030516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4758624,0.3821725,0.03482612,0.05575951,0.04173319,0.009646198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00197096,0.0007706095,0.006339554,0.007443117,0.0003217601,0.002947002,0.3897013,0.0005550492,0.009264626,0.1521534,0.1369378,0.2915948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002574261,0.002238919,0.002992729,0.01733424,0.0003800883,0.003714929,0.2375826,0.005842389,0.006934436,0.1650378,0.5547163,0.0006512119],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04421851,0.005136321,0.6304633,0.2596818,0.011485,0.01349184,0.001252577,0.00194229,0.03232834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2001333,0.00325555,0.6492904,0.04675967,0.003220102,0.07861996,0.0008860099,0.0008629935,0.01697193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6190569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7634073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8331526808634093,"score_gpt":0.666229364384388,"score_spread":0.1669233164790214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}