{"id":"W2158036720","doi":"10.5589/m09-037","title":"Evaluation of Landsat TM vegetation indices for estimating vegetation cover on semi-arid rangelands: a case study from Australia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing","topic":"Remote Sensing in Agriculture","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rangeland; Thematic Mapper; Arid; Vegetation (pathology); Shrubland; Remote sensing; Environmental science; Geography; Plant cover; Forestry; Physical geography; Ecology; Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Canopy; Satellite imagery; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00101356,0.0003434594,0.0002434906,0.0006325371,0.0004624186,0.0003465315,0.0003409188,0.0002171333,0.0002834976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002398713,0.0001530031,0.0002280888,0.0006049809,0.0002905384,0.0003482784,0.0003629946,0.0001517153,0.00008999794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006382731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003878592,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07194877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1289734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996071,0.0001723125,0.00003045798,0.00004522306,0.0001028859,0.00004199323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992211,0.0003031412,0.00008090024,0.00004931646,0.0002778699,0.00006766188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003795954,0.0005769338,0.8838339,0.0002443911,0.0000952522,0.003618326,0.004987383,0.006676358,0.01640803,0.0003443254,0.0003788427,0.08245666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004106283,0.0007990268,0.9594979,0.00003723906,0.00007961589,0.001429788,0.003603155,0.02901012,0.004238516,0.0001569803,0.001081317,0.00002530246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992808,0.00003199099,0.0003062765,0.00001128256,4.033359e-7,0.00002218603,0.00001949676,0.000002354333,0.0003253517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971719,0.00007243103,0.002340347,0.000007806967,0.000001345479,0.0000126029,0.00008698316,0.000002153016,0.0003044311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07194877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03907686116614999,"score_gpt":0.2941970238157798,"score_spread":0.2551201626496298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}