{"id":"W2158065679","doi":"10.1080/01431160701281064","title":"Evaluation of segment‐based gap‐filled Landsat ETM+ SLC‐off satellite data for land cover classification in southern Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Remote Sensing","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada; Agricultural Institute of Canada","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey","keywords":"Thematic Mapper; Land cover; Remote sensing; Contextual image classification; Thematic map; Satellite; Decision tree; Satellite imagery; Geography; Cartography; Land use; Computer science; Data mining; Image (mathematics); Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001104998,0.0003691474,0.0002981605,0.001276432,0.0006847613,0.0008663281,0.0007035352,0.0002570697,0.001512908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002765499,0.0002133051,0.0002246054,0.002391022,0.000278293,0.0004668405,0.0003619393,0.0002709915,0.0006177026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00758611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008695755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9465652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9765899,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999383,0.0001041995,0.00003649023,0.0000917155,0.0003064578,0.00007818762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997282,0.0003397149,0.00007696481,0.0001359654,0.001995962,0.0001693643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00140213,0.0003860393,0.5974811,0.0003097758,0.0004280954,0.0004717215,0.000853299,0.07673261,0.04031692,0.00119263,0.01417426,0.2662514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001634766,0.0001650902,0.7946432,0.00007570659,0.0001277367,0.00008797398,0.002145924,0.1828737,0.0115485,0.0002727256,0.007816249,0.00007980636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811039,0.0002450768,0.004976919,0.0002207608,0.00002256162,0.000177988,0.008316092,0.0003874583,0.004549172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676774,0.0002487635,0.01508221,0.00008814054,0.000005463037,0.0001098762,0.0131412,0.0000532664,0.003593847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05343485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08175275359171674,"score_gpt":0.2944674763665058,"score_spread":0.2127147227747891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}