{"id":"W2158068228","doi":"10.1017/s0266462310001200","title":"Moving cautiously: Public involvement and the health technology assessment community","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Health technology; Ambivalence; Work (physics); Public involvement; Public relations; Public health; Exploratory research; Political science; Medicine; Public administration; Sociology; Psychology; Nursing; Health care; Engineering; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07184031,0.0003819582,0.00050521,0.002131893,0.011061,0.01551481,0.002317099,0.006846189,0.007175747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1462087,0.0004163419,0.0006523618,0.001817998,0.02134693,0.01379937,0.01369089,0.009901803,0.0005320789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00553379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02659888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005428508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004808532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8549755,0.1184002,0.00243218,0.003053737,0.01308441,0.008053925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7867181,0.1539736,0.02278763,0.00693875,0.01368039,0.0159015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003049209,0.002128311,0.1035637,0.001149838,0.0001685093,0.002430614,0.4634136,0.0009049436,0.001723328,0.1660468,0.0296279,0.2285376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001727734,0.0004977862,0.05074973,0.002698049,0.000103917,0.001120159,0.6613865,0.001167107,0.00114943,0.1014407,0.1793404,0.0001734647],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5043789,0.003774662,0.01195509,0.382304,0.0006344576,0.0004112538,0.00003434546,0.0001154064,0.09639195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865922,0.0004747919,0.001261961,0.00952931,0.0001746276,0.0001194844,0.00001449766,0.00002238635,0.00181072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9281597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3799324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2952776170779043,"score_gpt":0.4747095183629066,"score_spread":0.1794319012850023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}