{"id":"W2158081620","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01636.x","title":"A hierarchical Bayesian approach to multi‐state mark–recapture: simulations and applications","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Census and Population Estimation","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bayesian hierarchical modeling; Mark and recapture; Bayes' theorem; Bayesian probability; Bayesian inference; Hierarchical database model; Computer science; Frequentist inference; Inference; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Data mining; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002941095,0.0001116334,0.0002707534,0.0002021077,0.0001143437,0.00002304229,0.0001049769,0.0000972071,0.00002670373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007733082,0.0000987817,0.0000477203,0.0001881033,0.00003019355,0.0000562774,0.00001936534,0.0002255963,0.000005651533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004983764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003642686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.28619e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001147342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990144,0.00003150891,0.0005161546,0.0001381267,0.0001288431,0.0001709723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990714,0.0002435267,0.0002871695,0.0001376724,0.00009854207,0.0001617466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005912355,0.002603138,0.004662492,0.0001283266,0.0001808449,0.000009281393,0.00508409,0.07239911,0.003864536,0.7693861,0.005955738,0.1351351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002471671,0.0003225018,0.1619604,0.00001560979,0.0001457562,0.0002222259,0.00014165,0.06551742,0.0001211212,0.7577835,0.01090319,0.0003949681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1864014,0.00002122727,0.8049276,0.001892936,0.0000726489,0.0008686979,0.00001346782,0.00003694627,0.005765105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7951303,0.000004408912,0.2042068,0.0004444768,0.0001154668,0.00001158702,0.000006097156,0.000009546802,0.00007131726],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6087289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4028201,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02823013757344976,"score_gpt":0.3109436111727626,"score_spread":0.2827134735993128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}