{"id":"W2158121860","doi":"10.1287/trsc.1110.0357","title":"Risk Aversion, the Value of Information, and Traffic Equilibrium","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Science","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Private information retrieval; Value of information; Risk aversion (psychology); The Internet; Population; Business; Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007695132,0.00004436647,0.00007662446,0.00008501526,0.00009534336,0.00001408639,0.0001439045,0.00001896004,0.0002032747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002156243,0.00003952536,0.00002236972,0.0001707739,0.0003259594,0.0009524442,0.000004549095,0.00003578862,0.00009754986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000177647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001446757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001776539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000952517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999412,0.00000422945,0.0003451727,0.0001135119,0.00003913672,0.00008594472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995506,0.00001456933,0.0002691203,0.0001194739,0.00001404826,0.00003215141],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001044916,0.00002403996,0.8075548,0.00001137694,0.0000072342,6.46471e-8,0.01653034,0.002863609,0.00007269476,0.17073,0.0000383543,0.002157076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001573495,0.00002348804,0.9894099,0.00000179839,0.000004093324,2.615216e-7,0.0004501384,0.004041597,0.0004679524,0.005075121,0.0003164946,0.0000518646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936199,0.00006995407,0.003148704,0.00005486288,0.00008417546,0.00009279843,0.00004963574,0.000007530475,0.002872476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988493,0.00009336449,0.0009505764,0.00006572963,0.000003864249,0.000003706995,0.000006562354,0.000002011631,0.00002493742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1818551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2225715,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05149043970239357,"score_gpt":0.1950721062556506,"score_spread":0.143581666553257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}