{"id":"W2158296563","doi":"10.1002/cjce.5450800425","title":"The Influence of Viscosity Ratio on Mixing Effectiveness in a Two‐fluid Laminar Motionless Mixer","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Fluid Dynamics and Mixing","field":"Engineering","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Laminar flow; Mixing (physics); Reynolds number; Viscosity; Materials science; Intensity (physics); Static mixer; Fluorescence; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Mechanics; Aqueous solution; Chemistry; Optics; Chromatography; Turbulence; Composite material; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000433005,0.0001221861,0.0001828224,0.0001207303,0.00005797487,0.00003840852,0.0002875981,0.0000431486,0.000003794197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000174698,0.00008837832,0.00006711696,0.0002171173,0.00004891023,0.00008997212,0.00001006934,0.0003914525,0.00000168817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000279198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003582453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003555281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003858264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999217,0.00002407456,0.0002973699,0.00006172332,0.0001381713,0.0002616584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993306,0.0002808583,0.00004385774,0.0001468547,0.0000605957,0.0001371661],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003726665,0.000003621134,0.0002034785,0.00003536034,0.00001996788,0.00001617673,0.0001977717,0.8302931,0.1680355,0.0008281572,0.00001313054,0.0003499532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005692107,0.00003214899,0.00637649,0.0006914455,0.00001887692,0.00007927672,0.00001535023,0.8927739,0.09898093,0.0001145029,0.0001399975,0.0002078364],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998106,0.0005462202,0.0009283772,0.00008277583,0.0001681002,0.00007368579,0.000002557797,0.000009535229,0.0000827619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998172,0.00001495506,0.00006764763,0.00001122445,0.00006010501,0.00000319177,2.929743e-7,0.0000211176,0.000004272423],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06905462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3603964,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004664306345071797,"score_gpt":0.1789738622097384,"score_spread":0.1743095558646666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}